Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Paidrick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1943No. 27,765PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, C. J.

All the parties to this action claim through Daniel Paidrick, a common grantor in possession May 29, 1875, of forty acres in Shelby County. He was married and had one child, Lewis C. Paidrick, who was unmarried and without children. In consideration of love and affection, his wife joining, Daniel then conveyed the tract to Lewis by warranty deed containing the following provisions:

“The grantors hereby expressly reserve the right to the use, occupation, rents, issues and profits, of all of said lands for and during the natural life of the grantor, Daniel Padrick. This conveyance is also made…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. SpurlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. King v. ReaIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Doe on demise of Patterson v. JackmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. McIlhinny v. McIlhinnyIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Gonzales v. BartonIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Theis v. HeuerIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. McLochlin v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Theis v. HeuerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Shuck Ex Rel. Shuck v. ShuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Leeds v. LeedsIndiana Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API