Legal Opinion

Bibeau v. Pacific Northwest Research Foundation Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1999No. 97-35825PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge KOZINSKI; Concurrence by Judge WALLACE.

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

More than thirty years ago, plaintiff Harold Bibeau suffered the unkindest cut of all. Today, he seeks to bring suit against those he claims are responsible for injuring him. The defendants parry by raising the statute of limitations. The district court agreed and entered summary judgment in favor of all defendants. See Bibeau v. Pacific Northwest Research Found., Inc., 980 F.Supp. 349, 358 (D.Or.1997). We must decide whether Bibeau was or should have been aware of his injuries, and is therefore barred from…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Alexandria Gregg v. Hawaii Dept. of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Community House, Inc. v. City of Boise, IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Labauve v. Olin Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2005
  5. Gary Klein v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API