Legal Opinion

Rindge v. Crags Land Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1922No. Civ. No. 3721PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to secure equitable relief of several kinds, all designed to protect rights asserted to be held by them to the use of waters flowing in Malibu Creek, in the county of Los Angeles. Defendant Crags Land Company owns land immediately above and adjoining that of plaintiffs. At a point on the former’s land Triunfo and Las Yirgines Creeks converge to form Malibu Creek, which latter flows thence and through the lands of plaintiffs to the Pacific Ocean. It was asserted that the defendants had, by the erection of a dam on Triunfo Creek, interfered with the natural flow…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Gallatin v. Corning Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Senior v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Meridian, Ltd. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Millview County Water District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Pleasant Valley Canal Co. v. BorrorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. In Re Water of Hallett Creek Stream SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Westlands Water District v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API