Rupe v. Cate
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING IN PART DEPENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
EDWARD F. SHEA, District Judge.
Before the Court, without oral argument, are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Ct.Rec.33) and Motion to Strike (Ct. Rec.3J). Plaintiff filed his Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint on October 16, 2008. Defendants filed the motions under consideration on August 10, 2009. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants and denies in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss with prejudice in part and without prejudice in part, and grants Defendants’ Motion to Strike.
I.…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- (PC) Lamar v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Miller v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Norsworthy v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Shrader v. ArvizaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Zaiza v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.