Angelo Joseph Pavone v. Louisiana State Board of Barbers Examiners
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM;
The only question we need decide in this ease is whether it needed to be heard initially by a statutory three-judge court. It appears that the trial court requested the appointment of a three-judge court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281, but that the Chief Judge of this court denied the request.
It is now well-settled law that a three-judge court need not be convened if the constitutional defense raised in the case is frivolous in that “previous decisions of [the Supreme Court of the United States] * * * foreclose the subject and leave no room for the inference that the question sought…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Goosby v. OsserSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sands v. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Bolton v. Texas Board of Barber ExaminersDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1972
- Pavone v. Louisiana State Board of Barber ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Baffoni v. State, Department of HealthSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Baffoni v. State, Department of HealthSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Christiaan's, Inc. v. ChobanianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Laufenberg v. Cosmetology Examining BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.