Legal Opinion · Dissent

Laufenberg v. Cosmetology Examining Board

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1979No. 76-191, 76-192Published

1DissentDay, J.

(dissenting) I dissent. The training of the two occupations of barber and cosmetologist have become so similar that there is no longer any justification for prohibiting a licensed cosmetologist from operating under a master barber in a barber shop or for prohibiting a journeyman barber from operating under a managing cosmetologist in a beauty shop.

The attorney general in the oral argument of this case on behalf of the two examining boards admitted that a woman can go into a barber shop run by a master barber and get all of the services such as scalp treatment, hair styling, permanents,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maryland State Board of Barber Examiners v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Green v. ShamaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Leetham v. McGinnUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bolton v. Texas Board of Barber ExaminersDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1972
  5. People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API