Laufenberg v. Cosmetology Examining Board
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentDay, J.
(dissenting) I dissent. The training of the two occupations of barber and cosmetologist have become so similar that there is no longer any justification for prohibiting a licensed cosmetologist from operating under a master barber in a barber shop or for prohibiting a journeyman barber from operating under a managing cosmetologist in a beauty shop.
The attorney general in the oral argument of this case on behalf of the two examining boards admitted that a woman can go into a barber shop run by a master barber and get all of the services such as scalp treatment, hair styling, permanents,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maryland State Board of Barber Examiners v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Green v. ShamaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Leetham v. McGinnUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Bolton v. Texas Board of Barber ExaminersDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1972
- People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.