Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Doering v. Doering

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

Respondent petitioner did not appear to contest the appeal because, we are advised, of the lack of funds to defray the expenses in connection therewith. There have been cases where under such circumstances we have reversed the judgment under the rules of the court. However, the custody of a minor child is a most serious matter and we have decided to consider the case on its merits. The record shows that petitioner and her husband are persons of limited means. The expense of the appeal was thrust upon her and we can understand her reluctance to incur the further financial indebtedness that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. State ex rel. FalligantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vogt v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kurz v. KurzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API