Legal Opinion
Vogt v. Nelson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1975No. 632PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, C. J.
The appellant has moved for discretionary reversal as of course under sec. (Rule) 251.57, Stats., because the respondents’ brief is late. The appellant is the plaintiff in an action for fraudulent misrepresentation on the mileage on a used car which he bought from the defendants. The complaint included a prayer for treble damages and actual attorney’s fees as provided by Title IV, sec. 409, of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, Pub. L. 92-513, 86 Stats. 963, 15 U.S. Code, see. 1989 (a).
The case was tried to a jury, which returned a special verdict finding- that defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- City of Madison v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- State ex rel. Doering v. DoeringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by10 opinions
- Terry v. KolskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Kostel Funeral Home, Inc. v. Duke Tufty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Harden v. Gregory MotorsWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Janesville v. GarthwaiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Hall v. Riverside Lincoln Mercury-Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.