Legal Opinion

Kurz v. Kurz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1974No. 324PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

No appeal was taken and no challenge is now raised to the original divorce decree findings that: (1) Both plaintiff and defendant were not fit and proper persons to have custody of the minor child of the parties; (2) that the interests of such child demanded that custody be placed with its paternal grandparents; and (3) that care and custody of the child be awarded to the paternal grandparents. As the trial court noted in its opinion, “No serious claim is made by the defendant that the complete welfare of the child is not being met at the home of the paternal grandparents aided and assisted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wendland v. WendlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lacher v. VenusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Dees v. DeesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Kritzik v. KritzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ponsford v. CruteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paterson v. PatersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Barstad v. FrazierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Barstad v. FrazierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API