Legal Opinion

Martin v. Haycock

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 30, 1947No. Docket 148/562PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A construction of the last will and testament of William J. Sweeney, a practicing physician, who died April 22d 1945, is sought by the complainant, the executor named therein. The will is dated February 24th, 1938. It was probated May 3d 1945, before the surrogate of the County of Hudson. The complainant and the decedent's wife, Mary Catherine Sweeney, who predeceased the testator, were named executor and executrix, respectively.

The complainant seeks to be advised (a) as to what is included in the testator's expression "the contents of the house at 68 Clifton Terrace, Weehawken, New Jersey,"…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of MacDowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. MacKenzie v. Trustees of the PresbyterySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  3. Noice v. SchnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  4. Stevenson v. EarlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  5. Gilman v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1854

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mirinda v. KingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. N.Y. Community TrustNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  3. Howard Savings Inst. of Newark v. PeepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API