Legal Opinion

Howard Savings Inst. of Newark v. Peep

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 10, 1961Published

1Opinion of the Court

34 N.J. 494 (1961)

170 A.2d 39

THE HOWARD SAVINGS INSTITUTION OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, EXECUTOR UNDER THE WILL OF C. EDWARD McKINNEY, JR., DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

FLORENCE PEEP AND ALBERT HUGHEY, DEFENDANTS-CROSS-APPELLANTS, AND THE TRUSTEES OF AMHERST COLLEGE, ALICE J. STEVENS AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 19, 1960.

Decided April 10, 1961.

Mr. William D. Hardin argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Smith, Slingerland, Trauth & Holtz, attorneys; Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Ward, of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. MacKenzie v. Trustees of the PresbyterySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  3. Howard Savings Inst. of Newark v. PeepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Speer v. ColbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Wilber v. OwensSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API