Legal Opinion

Graves v. Arnado

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1989No. USDC Civil 87-6269-ME; SC S35326PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This case involves two questions certified from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon: 1(1) May Josephine County, by adopting personnel rules, impose conditions of due process or cause on a sheriffs authority under ORS 204.601[ 2 ] and ORS 204.635[ 3 ] to appoint and/or terminate the employment of deputy sheriffs?

Our answer is YES.(2) Is a sheriff bound by a predecessor’s adoption of due process and termination for cause requirements concerning his deputies, at least until some official action is taken by the new sheriff to delete or change those requirements?

Our answer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miles v. City of BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Brunick v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Board of Klamath County Commissioners v. Select County EmployeesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Crossler v. HilleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Tyler v. Hartford InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API