Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Hartford Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 11, 1989No. 87-04-21572-L; CA A45275PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

The Supreme Court vacated our order1 that granted attorney fees pursuant to ORS 20.105(1) to certain of the defendants who had appeared in this court and remanded the matter to v. to make findings on the record and a new order. Tyler v. Hartford Insurance Group, 307 Or 603, 771 P2d 274 (1989). We reinstate our original order on the basis of the findings in this opinion.

On April 29,1987, plaintiff filed a 92-page complaint. On August 3,1987, the complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim.2 Defendants were awarded attorney fees by the trial court pursuant to ORS 20.105(1) arid ORCP…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Hartford Insurance GroupOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Graves v. ArnadoOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Brown v. Infotec Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Portland Development Commission v. CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cooper v. MareshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API