Legal Opinion

Slayton v. Singleton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1888No. 2505PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Wichita. Tried below before Hon. J. M. O'Neill, Special District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Associate Justice.

Slayton appeals from a judgment and decree in which he is allowed in partition one-eighth interest in certain lands when he insists he was entitled to one-fourth interest.

The lands were granted in right of heirs of R. J. Scott, a soldier who fell at Goliad in 1836, unmarried, without issue, and intestate. His parents, John and Sarah Scott, resided in Tennessee and were his heirs.

Sarah Scott died in 1842, leaving four children. The father, John Scott, died in Tennessee in 1865, the four children surviving.

It appears in the record that John Scott left a will, which in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Paschal v. AcklinTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  3. March v. HuyterTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Ryan v. Texas & Pacific RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Holmes v. JohnsTexas Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BlankenburgTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Kenedy Pasture Co. v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Keith v. KeithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Zarate v. VillarealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Howth v. FarrarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API