Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Blankenburg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1951No. A-2783PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smedley

The district court rendered judgment in favor of petitioner, Humble Oil & Refining Company, against the City of Charlotte, Texas, and respondents Otis Blankenburg, Cleo F. Blankenburg, David Kane and J. S. Atkins for the title and possession of all of the parks and plazas and the one half of the streets and alleys which are adjacent to or abut on the parks and plazas in the City of Charlotte, subject to an easement in the public to use the property for park, plaza, street and alley purposes. The judgment enjoined those who were parties defendant in the trial court from commencing or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Federal Crude Oil Co. v. Yount-Lee Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Aransas Pass Harbor Co. v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Steddum v. Kirby Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Baumgarten v. FrostTexas Supreme Court · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dahlberg v. HoldenTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Perry v. Dearing (In Re Perry)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API