Davenport v. Whittier Mills Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is well-settled law, by repeated decisions of the Supreme Court and this court, that in a dispossessoryrwarrant case, where the defendant has filed a counter-affidavit and given the required bond, the only questions to be determined on the trial of the case in the superior court are the issues raised by the plaintiff’s affidavit and the counter-affidavit; and that where the counter-affidavit fails to deny any basic allegation of fact contained in the affidavit of the plaintiff, such allegation is treated as admitted by the defendant. Mitchell v. White,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hughes v. PurcellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Chattahoochee Valley Railway Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Hindman v. RaperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Mitchell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Werner v. FootmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carroll v. YeartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Battles v. Anchor Rome Mills Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Goolsby v. McNairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Sparks v. RinkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965