Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Rinker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1965No. 41163Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

“The purpose of the Summary Judgment Act is to afford to either party litigant, upon motion, a judgment forthwith if the record shows there is not a genuine issue existing between the parties, but only after each party has had opportunity to make out his case, or establish his defense, as the case may be, and where, as in this case, if plaintiff in error, at the time of the hearing on the motion for summary judgment had any valid defenses, it was his duty to present same at that time.” Studstill v. Aetna Cas. &c. Co., 101 Ga. App. 766 (2) (115 SE2d 374).

Where in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Studstill v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Davenport v. Whittier Mills CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API