Legal Opinion

Hindman v. Raper

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1915PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Eviction. Before Judge Wright. Floj^d superior court. June 24, 1914. (See 140 Qa. 775.)

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. In dispossessory-warrant proceedings, where it appeared that the tenant contracted to pay a stipulated sum for a year, and that at the end of the year he had failed to pay it, and that his landlord had foreclosed a distress warrant to collect the rent, the landlord’s vendee was entitled to all the rights of the original landlord, including the right to issue a dispossessory warrant; and in an issue formed upon *644that, where the counter-affidavit did not deny that a demand was made, it was not error to charge that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the premises in dispute.

July 3, 1915.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Raines v. HindmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Mitchell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hughes v. PurcellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Gunn v. Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Crider v. HeddenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Hooks v. LeaseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Moore v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API