Legal Opinion

Moore v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1936No. 25473PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

“Upon the death of a person intestate, choses in action in his favor pass.to his administrator; and his heirs at law can take no more than an equitable interest therein, except through the intermediation of the administrator. The heirs, although all of them are sui juris and of full age, can not maintain an action at law upon a chose in action in favor of the intestate, notwithstanding there is no administrator and all debts due by the intestate have been paid.” Hill v. Maffett, 3 Ga. App. 89 (59 S. E. 325). R. D. Moore and Mrs. Lucy I. Moore obtained a judgment against Orrin Roberts. J. H.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hill v. MaffettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Life Casualty-Insurance Co., Tennessee v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  2. Bailey v. Bankers Health & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Moore v. Roberts & RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API