Life Casualty-Insurance Co., Tennessee v. Marks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The point raised by the general demurrer, that the plaintiff does not show any right to bring or maintain the present suit, is well taken and is controlling. The suit is brought by the plaintiff in her individual capacity and she fails to show any right on her part as such to bring or maintain the action. The only connection that she shows with the subject-matter of the suit is that the applicant for the insurance, Luther C. Marks, was her husband. She. does not allege or claim that she was the beneficiary of the insurance for which he had applied. “…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Groover v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Hill v. MaffettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Guaranty Life Insurance v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Bennett v. BottomsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Pate v. Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Butcher v. PollardOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Nixon v. Life Insurance Company of VirginiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Nixon v. Life Insurance Company of VirginiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Peden v. PedenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008