Bailey v. Bankers Health & Life Insurance

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

1. The plaintiff, as the son and heir at law of the insured, would not be entitled to recover the weekly benefits which the defendant agreed to pay to the insured in the event of his becoming disabled from sickness and confined to, his bed. The same is true as to the plaintiff as beneficiary of the policy. The policy provides that the company agrees “to pay to said insured the amount of the weekly benefit." The insured became disabled from sickness on January 17, 1941, and continued in such condition until his death on December 17, 1941; and it was alleged…