Legal Opinion

Luma v. Elrac Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 19, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

*595Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, that branch of the motion of the defendant Justin J. Cupid which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict and for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him is denied, and the jury verdict is reinstated.

“ ‘A motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to CPLR . . . 4404 may be granted only when the trial court determines that, upon the evidence presented, there is no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational persons to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Tapia v. Dattco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Ryan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API