Legal Opinion

Tung v. Cassagne

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1931No. 13749PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $134.-74, the alleged balance due for laundry service performed for defendant during the first week of July, 1929. The defense is payment. There was judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $.35, and he has appealed. •

The law is clear that he who pleads payment admits .the existence of the debt and must prove payment. 5 Louisiana Digest, Payment, Page 890, § 21; Smith v. Turner, 3 La. App. 91; Hitt v. Herndon, 7 La. App. 87; Brown v. King, 7 La. App. 546; Johnson v. Jones, 5 La. App. 220.

The record shows that plaintiff was engaged in the laundry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Smith v. TurnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Brown v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Hitt v. HerndonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Giardina v. D'AntoniLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Gore v. VeithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Foeckler v. BallaronLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API