Legal Opinion

Gore v. Veith

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1934No. 14843PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit for $112.50, the amount alleged to be due Dr. Samuel Davis Gore, under an agreement for the performance of dental work for the daughter of the defendant. The defense is, in effect, a plea of payment, and, in the alternative, the prescription of three years is pleaded.

From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, as prayed for, defendant has appealed.

The contention of defendant is that the prescription of three years established by article 3538, Rev. Civ. Code, applies to dentists, who may properly be included within the class of “physicians, surgeons and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Royal Ins. v. Romain Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Derbes v. Checker Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Tung v. CassagneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stephen J. Kozan v. Dr. Glenn E. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Erdal v. ErdalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Stephen J. Kozan v. Dr. Glenn E. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API