Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 21, 2015No. 2D13-722Published

1Opinion of the Court

CASANUEVA, Judge.

We affirm James L. Johnson’s judgments and sentences in this Anders 1 appeal without discussion. However, this af-firmance is without prejudice to Johnson filing a facially sufficient motion seeking additional jail time credit pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801.

During the pendency of this appeal, Johnson filed a pro se “Petition to Correct Jail Credits,” pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). 2 The circuit court properly struck this motion because it was filed during the pendency of an appeal. See Scott v. State, 976 So.2d 628 (Fla. 2d DCA…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ricardo Vincent v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API