Legal Opinion

Ricardo Vincent v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 8, 2014No. 4D14-658PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Prior to the effective date of rule 3.801, the appellant filed an insufficient rule 3.800(a) motion seeking additional jail time credit. The trial court summarily denied it based on the state’s response, which explained that appellant had received all the credit to which he was entitled. The state did not attach any portions of the record to its response, and the trial court did not attach any to its order. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1051 (Fla.2011) (explaining trial court need not attach documents to refute a rule 3.800(a) claim). The appellant appealed, seeking the portions of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nave v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Willie Georges v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API