Legal Opinion

Henry v. Pittsb. Etc. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1891No. 214PublishedCited by 109 opinions

APPEAL BY PLAINTIFE FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS NO. 2 OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY. No. 214 October Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 322 April Term 1888, C. P. No. 2. On Mareb 1, 1888, John C. Henry brought trespass against the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company and Elliott Holbrook.

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY PLAINTIFE FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS NO. 2 OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY. No. 214 October Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 322 April Term 1888, C. P. No. 2. On Mareb 1, 1888, John C. Henry brought trespass against the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company and Elliott Holbrook. The first count of the plaintiff’s statement of claim averred, in substance, that on December 19, 1887, the defendant company, through said Holbrook, who was its general superintendent, maliciously and without probable cause suspended the plaintiff from the position of traveling passenger-agent of said…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION,

Mb. Cheep Justice Paxson :

The plaintiff seeks to hold the defendant company responsible in damages, because (a) he was, as he alleges, suspended from the service of the company maliciously, and without probable cause, under circumstances which tended to cast suspicion upon his integrity, and that, after an investigation, he was not reinstated, although the result of said investigation showed that he had committed no fraud upon the company; and (5) that the defendant company, through its general superintendent, Elliott Plolbrook, (one of the defendants,) at the time of such suspension…

2Cited by109 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Leroy D. Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation and Industrial Valley Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API