Legal Opinion

State v. Klitzke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for McLeod county, Edson, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of guilty in a bastardy proceeding.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

The application on the part of the state that the appeal to this court be dismissed, is denied. The procedure by which a judgment of the district court, or its order upon motion for a new trial, in bastardy proceedings, may be appealed to this court is that regulating appeals in civil actions. See State v. Worthingham, 23 Minn. 528; State v. Snure, 29 Minn. 132, (12 N. W. Rep. 347;) State *344v. Nichols, 29 Minn. 357, (13 N. W. Rep. 153.) The ground of the motion to dismiss this appeal is that a notice of appeal does not appear to have been served upon the clerk of the district court. It does…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WorthinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Prindle v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
  4. State v. SnureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schilling v. OdlebakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. State v. JeffreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Skaggs v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Bloom v. Sioux City Traction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API