State v. Jeffrey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Chief Justice.
Defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He was convicted in bastardy proceedings of being the father of an illegitimate child.
Under our statute a party to the record in a civil action may be called by the adverse party as if under cross-examination. G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 9816. The object or purpose is that a litigant may call the adverse party without making him his own wit ness and elicit from Mm, if possible, material facts witMn his knowledge.
In this, a bastardy proceeding under our statute, defendant was required, over his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. WorthinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- State v. NestavalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- State v. KlitzkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- State ex rel. Johnson v. BechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fedderwitz v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- People v. StoecklMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Bill by and Through Bill v. GossettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. LenderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.