Legal Opinion

State v. Jeffrey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 24, 1933No. 29,166PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Chief Justice.

Defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He was convicted in bastardy proceedings of being the father of an illegitimate child.

Under our statute a party to the record in a civil action may be called by the adverse party as if under cross-examination. G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 9816. The object or purpose is that a litigant may call the adverse party without making him his own wit ness and elicit from Mm, if possible, material facts witMn his knowledge.

In this, a bastardy proceeding under our statute, defendant was required, over his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WorthinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. State v. NestavalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. State v. KlitzkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. State ex rel. Johnson v. BechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fedderwitz v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. People v. StoecklMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Bill by and Through Bill v. GossettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. State v. LenderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API