Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Sioux City Traction Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 16, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. J. IT. Oliver, Judge. Action for damages resulted iu a directed verdict for defendant, and judgment thereon. The plaintiff appeals. On rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

I. notice:' sufficiency. I. The notice of appeal was not addressed to the clerk of the district court, though as such officer he accepted service in writing thereon, and the notice was filed with him on the same day. Because of the omission of- the address, the defendant moves that the appeal be dismissed. Had the address of defendant and its attorneys been omitted, the notice must have been treated as insufficient. In re Estate of Anderson, 125 Iowa, 670. Service of notice on tbe adverse party is exacted for tbe obvious purpose of informing bim that an appeal bas been taken in order that be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. State v. KlitzkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. SterrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Sanxey v. Iowa City Glass Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. McCarthy v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Banking Corp. of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Des Moines National Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Pilkington v. PotwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. In re Paving AssessmentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Stevens v. Peoples Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API