Legal Opinion

Payne Furnace & Supply Co. v. Williams-Wallace Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1941No. 9327Published

1Opinion of the Court

117 F.2d 823 (1941)

PAYNE FURNACE & SUPPLY CO., Inc.,

v.

WILLIAMS-WALLACE CO.

No. 9327.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 14, 1941.

Lyon & Lyon, Frederick S. Lyon, and R. E. Caughey, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

A. Donham Owen, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from an interlocutory decree sustaining the validity of Letters Patent No. 2,013,193 of Stadtfeld and holding it infringed.

It is conceded that the patent, if valid, was infringed. The questions argued concern the validity of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API