City of Aurora v. Ackman
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRISWELL, Judge.
Plaintiff, City of Aurora (City), appeals the declaratory decree of the district court which determined that certain state statutes and ordinances of the City, relating to its firemen’s eligibility for retirement, could not validly be applied to those firemen who were initially hired by the City prior to January 1, 1976. We affirm.
The City is a home rule municipality organized pursuant to the provisions of Colo. Const, art. XX. Prior to January 1, 1976, its firemen’s retirement program was governed by the statutory provisions applicable to all municipalities with a population…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Police Pension & Relief Board v. McPhailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Duprey v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Justus v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Keelan v. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of Lamar v. Lamar Police Department Money Purchase Pension TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- No., Colorado Attorney General Reports2004