Seaboard Warehouse Terminals, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
CABOT, District Judge.
This cause came before the court on the motion of the defendant, Dun and Bradstreet, Inc., to dismiss the amended complaint of the plaintiff for failure to state a claim upon which relief might be granted. The court issued an order on May 13, 1971, granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s original complaint for the reason, that plaintiff’s complaint only supported a libel per quod action, which required that special damages be alleged and the plaintiff failed to allege such damages. Plaintiff’s amended complaint also fails to assert…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Diplomat Electric, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Supply Company, a Division of Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Eli E. Albert, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Harwood v. BushDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- David Pope Hood v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Hood v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- David Pope Hood v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Seaboard Warehouse Terminals, Inc. v. Dun and Bradstreet, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.