Legal Opinion

Eli E. Albert, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 6, 1950PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, District Judge.

Defendant moves pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A., to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim for relief. Plaintiff sets forth two claims, each of them to the effect that certain reports issued by defendant concerning plaintiff’s financial standing were false and libelous.

The allegedly libelous statements a're to the effect that plaintiff’s financial strength was $125,000 to $200,000; that its credit was “fair”; that the plaintiff had a “high credit of $1000 to $5000,” later changed to “$300 to $25,000,” and still…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neaton v. Lewis Apparel Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Daves v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1953
  2. Hlavinka v. Blunt, Ellis & Loewi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Sump v. City of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Rambur v. Diehl Lumber CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Thurston v. Setab Computer InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API