Legal Opinion

David Pope Hood v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1973No. 72-1233Published

1Opinion of the Court

486 F.2d 25

David Pope HOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 72-1233.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 14, 1973.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 31, 1973.

Rex T. Reeves, Merrell Collier, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Hugh M. Dorsey, Jr., W. Rhett Tanner, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

Before GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

INGRAHAM, Circuit Judge:

1

This is an action for libel predicated upon allegedly false and defamatory statements published in a credit report provided by defendant Dun & Bradstreet,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API