Legal Opinion

James Thomas Cahill v. Ruth Rushen, Director, California Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1982No. 81-4009PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Appellee James Cahill was convicted of first degree murder in California state court in February 1975, after a trial in which his confession to a police officer was admitted into evidence. After exhausting available state remedies, Cahill petitioned the court below for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court granted the writ on the ground that the State had interfered with Cahill’s sixth amendment right to counsel. Cahill v. Rushen, 501 F.Supp. 1219 (E.D.Cal.1980). We affirm because we conclude that the confession was “deliberately elicited…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Donald Edward Beaty v. Terry Stewart, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. People v. WhittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. SargentWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. United States v. Kenneth Blaine WillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API