Legal Opinion
United States v. Kenneth Blaine Willard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1990No. 89-30206PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge:
Appellant appeals his sentence under the sentencing guidelines. We affirm.
I
Appellant argues that the district court violated his fifth and sixth amendment rights in considering for sentencing purposes statements he made to arresting federal officers. The fifth and sixth amendments apply to information used at sentencing. See United States v. Watt, 910 F.2d 587 (9th Cir.1990). The district court’s findings of fact are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Wolf, 813 F.2d 970, 974 (9th Cir.1987). Review of the district court’s conclusion that a suspect’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Danny Leon GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Diego RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Bayron Moreno (89-1150/1208), Scott Krugielka (89-1171/1209), Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Joseph William GillockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. James Edward RoedererCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Timothy PittsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Sonja HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Lopez-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.