Legal Opinion

L.A. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 2012No. D060589PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, Acting P. J.

In this habeas corpus proceeding two minors argue the juvenile court unlawfully committed them to juvenile hall during school hours after unsuccessfully attempting to obtain their compliance with its orders that they attend school. Although because neither minor is still in custody, habeas corpus relief is not available, we will treat their joint petition as a petition for a writ of mandate. We do so because both minors are still subject to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, it does not appear the truancy problems which give rise to the orders they challenge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michael G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. VillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Escamilla v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. In Re Wessley W.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. Humberto O.California Court of Appeal · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. R.M. (In re R.M.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API