Legal Opinion

State v. Cottrell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 15, 1992PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WADE, Judge.

The defendant, Scottie Cottrell, appeals from his convictions for driving under the influence (second offense) and violation of the implied consent statute. In a bifurcated trial, the jury decided the issue of whether the defendant was guilty of DUI and violation of the implied consent law. By agreement, the trial judge determined whether the DUI offense was a first or second. After determin*675ing that it was the latter, the trial court sentenced the defendant to 11 months and 29 days with probation to be granted after 45 days in jail. A fine of $500.00 was imposed. His…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CabbageTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Byrge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  3. State v. MacKeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. McClintockTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. StrouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. NicholsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Reid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. State v. KinneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State v. MarburyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API