Legal Opinion

Glancy Malleable Iron Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

This appeal involves principally the question as to which of the two compensation insurance carriers, who are parties to this action, is liable for compensation to the defendant, Gottfried Schmoller, as an employee of the plaintiff, Glancy Malleable Iron Company (hereinafter called the Glancy Company). From January, 1901, to May, 1933, Schmoller was in the employment of that company. Its insurance against liability for workmen’s compensation was carried by the defendant, Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company (hereinafter called the Employers Company), at all times material to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. North End Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Outboard Motor Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Bonomo v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Smolenski v. Eastern Coal Dock Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Motor Castings Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Struck & Irwin Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Highway Trailer Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Odanah Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Carr's, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API