Legal Opinion

Bonomo v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1933No. Appeal 346PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

The statement of question involved submitted by the appellant is, “where an employe suffered a permanent injury but, after a short period of total disability, returned to the same job and received the same wages as before the accident, is he entitled to recover workmen’s compensation for partial disability while he continues in that employment and at that wage?” The court answered in the affirmative.

Bonomo, the plaintiff, was employed by Bazley as a common laborer. He suffered a fracture of the right leg on March 26, 1930. Compensation was paid pursuant to an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. Bausch v. FidlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Johnson v. Jeddo Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Piper v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Yeager v. Anthracite Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Henry v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Strickland v. Baugh & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Plum v. Hotel WashingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Sayre v. Textile Machine WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Cavanaugh v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API