Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. McDonald

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1968No. Crim. 13193PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINGSLEY, J

Defendant was charged with three counts of indecent exposure, in violation of subdivision 1, of section 314 of the Penal Code. A prior conviction of violation of the same section was also charged. Defendant admitted the prior, but pled not guilty to the three offenses herein involved. After a trial by jury, he was found guilty as charged. The criminal proceedings were suspended and, after the receipt of medical reports, he was committed to Atascadero State Hospital for observation, purportedly under section 5512 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Nothing in the record 2 shows…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. CramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. SuccopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In re JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. YarberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. People v. ColvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. In Re AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API