American Telephone and Telegraph Company and Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge PAULINE NEWMAN.
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States Court of Federal Claims dismissed the American Telephone & Telegraph Company’s (AT & T) suit against the Navy for failure to state a claim. Because the Navy’s violation of section 8118 of the Department of Defense (DoD) Act, Pub.L. No. 100-202, section 8118, 101 Stat. 1329, 1329-84 (1987), and alleged violation of various procurement regulations and directives was not a wrong actionable by AT & T, this court affirms.
I
The Court of Federal Claims…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- United Pacific Insurance Company, Reliance Insurance Company, and Reliance National v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- PlanetSpace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- DynCorp International LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.