Legal Opinion
LaSalle Group, Inc. v. Electromation of Delaware County, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 8, 2008No. 18A02-0705-CV-397PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
LaSalle Group appeals an order finding its arbitration agreement with a subcontractor was void and accordingly denying its motion to enforce the agreement. As the Indiana statute on which the trial court relied is preempted by federal law, we reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
LaSalle Group was the general contractor for the construction of a Wal-Mart in Muncie. Electromation was a subcontractor. Electromation sued LaSalle, alleging LaSalle breached the subcontractor agreement. The agreement provides LaSalle has sole discretion to decide whether a dispute will be resolved…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. v. Monsanto Co. & Monsanto Technology LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- David Earley and Rhonda Earley v. Edward Jones & Co., LP, Edward Jackson, and Adam JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- SACHSE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. AFFIRMED DRYWALL CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. v. Monsanto Co. & Monsanto Technology LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Professional Construction, Inc. v. Historic Walnut Square, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2023