Legal Opinion

David Earley and Rhonda Earley v. Edward Jones & Co., LP, Edward Jackson, and Adam Jackson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2018No. 36A04-1710-PL-2258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Senior Judge.

*1096 Case Summary

[1] David and Rhonda Earley ("the Earleys") appeal the trial court's stay and order compelling arbitration in their action against Edward D. Jones & Co., LP ("Edward Jones"), Edward Jackson, and Adam Jackson (collectively, "Defendants"). We affirm.

Issues

[2] The Earleys raise two issues, which we restate as:

I. whether the trial court properly found that the arbitration agreements between the parties were enforceable; and

II. whether the trial court properly found that the Federal Arbitration Act applied rather than Missouri law.

Facts

[3] Edward Jones is a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. MPACT Construction Group, LLC v. Superior Concrete Constructors, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Brumley v. Commonwealth Business ColLege Education Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mary Rodgers-Rouzier v. American Queen Steamboat Operating Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  2. Forte v. Insomnia Cookies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  3. Valesh v. Bajco International LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  4. Woods v. Stakeholder Payroll Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API