Legal Opinion
Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1961No. 18339PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us for the second time. The plaintiff-appellee, Mrs. Florence Lustig Crossman, doing business as Florence Lustig, operates women’s dress shops in Miami Beach, Palm Beach, and Bal Harbour, Florida, in New York City, and elsewhere. The defendant-appellant is the Fontainebleau Hotel Corporation of Miami Beach, Florida. In 1959 Mrs. Crossman sued Fontainebleau to restrain the defendant from evicting her and to obtain specific performance of a lease with an option to renew for five years. The lease was unsigned but, according to the complaint, was reduced…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Roth v. HyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Munro v. PostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hattie Brazier v. W. B. CherryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Morrow v. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Harvey Thomas Smoot, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Justino Lugo Vega v. The Steamship Malula, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and Oscar G. Abello AmellerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Donald F. Bettenhausen and Bernice A. BettenhausenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.