Legal Opinion

Shrum v. Simpson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1900No. 19361PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Prom the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

— Appellant’s decedent oivned and was in the possession of a farm of 160 acres, in Washington county, Indiana. He entered into a farming contract with the appellee for the term of one year from March 1, 1898. The agreement was by parol. By its provisions, the appellee was to have the possession of the tract for one year from and after March 1, 1898; he was to cultivate the same, the decedent designating what crops should be planted, and in what fields they should be raised; appellee was to have the house, the barn, and the garden plot, and was to pay $2.50 per month as rent for them; he was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dixon v. NiccollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Needham v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Alwood v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  4. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Thompson v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chariton Feed and Grain, Inc. v. HarderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  2. State ex rel. Ratliffe v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hanthorn v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Breinig v. SparrowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Florence v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API