Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Perlman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1990No. 247PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the order below denying appellant’s petition for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. Appellant contends that he is entitled to relief under the PCRA because (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions; and (2) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to (a) call a character witness and (b) assert the accountant-client privilege to bar the testimony of appellant’s accountant at trial. We affirm.

On December 13, 1985, following a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of sixteen counts of failing to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. SaccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PetroskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. TannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. WeinderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. WhitmoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. MelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API