Commonwealth v. Perlman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This appeal is from the order below denying appellant’s petition for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. Appellant contends that he is entitled to relief under the PCRA because (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions; and (2) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to (a) call a character witness and (b) assert the accountant-client privilege to bar the testimony of appellant’s accountant at trial. We affirm.
On December 13, 1985, following a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of sixteen counts of failing to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. SaccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PetroskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. TannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. WeinderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. WhitmoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. MelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.