Commonwealth v. Whitmore
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J.:
¶ 1 Raheem Whitmore appeals from the order dismissing his Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition. See 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-46. Whitmore avers that the PCRA court erred in finding that appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise a substantial question in challenging the sentence on appeal. Whitmore also contends that the PCRA court erred in finding that trial and appellate counsel were not ineffective in failing to file a motion to reconsider his sentence and a motion seeking.recusal by the trial judge from presiding over his sentencing proceedings. Upon review, we…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. GogginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. WatsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. RoddaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VenturaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. MacIasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. FowlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. BullockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.