Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Whitmore

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 2004PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Raheem Whitmore appeals from the order dismissing his Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition. See 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-46. Whitmore avers that the PCRA court erred in finding that appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise a substantial question in challenging the sentence on appeal. Whitmore also contends that the PCRA court erred in finding that trial and appellate counsel were not ineffective in failing to file a motion to reconsider his sentence and a motion seeking.recusal by the trial judge from presiding over his sentencing proceedings. Upon review, we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. GogginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. WatsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. RoddaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VenturaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. MacIasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. FowlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. BullockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API