Legal Opinion

Brandes v. Mitterling

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1948No. 5006PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Superior Judge.

The plaintiffs in the lower court, hereinafter called the appellants, are the in dividual owners of certain improved and unimproved real property located on East Broadway, Tucson, Arizona, which they acquired prior to the year 1945. The total acreage owned by appellants is approximately "140 acres and, with improvements, is valued at approximately $250,000. ’During May and September, 1945, the defendants in the lower court, hereinafter called the appellees, acquired approximately 28 acres of land which is surrounded on the east, south and west by the lands owned by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Thrasher v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Antonik v. ChamberlainOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Warren Township School District No. 7 v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Swetland v. Curtiss Airports CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Oklahoma Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Mills v. Orcas Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Anderson v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. City of Phoenix v. HarlanArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Harris Cattle Co. v. Paradise Motors, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API